Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rights and Liberties

Prisoner 345: An Arab Journalist's Five Years in Guantanamo

By Rachel Morris, Columbia Journalism Review. Posted July 23, 2007.


What happened to Al Jazeera’s Sami al-Haj?
Advertisement

On December 15, 2001, early in the morning on the last day of Ramadan, a reporter and a cameraman from Al Jazeera arrived at the Pakistani town of Charman on the Afghanistan border, on their way to cover the American military operation. The reporter, Abdelhaq Sadah, was replacing a colleague, but the cameraman, a Sudanese national named Sami al-Haj, had been on such an assignment before, and had crossed the border without incident. This time, however, an immigration official stopped him. He seemed angry. The official told Sadah that he could go, but "your friend is a wanted man and will stay here."

In Sadah's recollection, the official produced a letter from Pakistani intelligence -- written, curiously, in English. It said that al-Haj had Al Qaeda ties and should be apprehended. Al-Haj noticed that the passport number in the letter didn't correspond to the one in his current passport, but instead to an old passport he had lost several years ago in Sudan and had reported missing. Despite his protests, the official insisted on detaining him overnight. The next morning, Sadah returned to the border post just in time to see a Pakistani military officer lead al-Haj to a car and drive him away.

Al-Haj is a tall, slender man whose round face and glasses give him a boyish demeanor. In photographs, he looks much younger than his thirty-eight years. People who have met him invariably describe him as polite; in conversation he is said to smile almost constantly.

After Sadah informed Al Jazeera management what had happened, the network made contact with the Pakistani authorities and was told that al-Haj's background was being investigated. On January 4, al-Haj called his wife, Asma, who was then living in Azerbaijan. He sounded confident, almost cheerful, saying that he expected to be back in Doha, Qatar, Al Jazeera's headquarters, in two or three days.

Instead, al-Haj was taken to an underground prison in Kabul. There, he was transferred to American custody. On January 7, he was brought by helicopter to Bagram Air Base. Al-Haj later described his disorienting arrival to his lawyer. After a fifteen-minute flight, he said, he was pitched from the helicopter into the icy night, hitting the tarmac so hard that he briefly lost consciousness. He claimed that he was then kicked and beaten by military police, who removed the black bag from his head and cut off his clothes. After performing what al-Haj called an "intimate body search," they dressed him in a blue uniform, and said, "You record videos of Osama bin Laden for Al Jazeera."

For the next six months, al-Haj was held in Afghanistan. In early June 2002, he was put on a military plane. In another letter to his lawyer, he explains that his hands were gloved and cuffed and linked to his leg shackles; his mouth was gagged. Every so often, American soldiers removed the gag to feed him peanut butter crackers. The plane landed many hours later. On June 14, al-Haj was given an orange jumpsuit and the ID number 345. He was in Cuba. For the past five years, al-Haj has been the only journalist known to be held in Guantánamo Bay.

Many questions surround Sami al-Haj. After talking with his colleagues, friends, family members, and lawyer, I could piece together only a partial picture of his life. He grew up in the Sudan, where an uncle, who was better off than al-Haj's family, helped him attend college in India, where he studied computers and English. In the late 1990s, he took a job as an administrative assistant for a company called Union Beverages, and later worked in a similar role for an import-export company in the United Arab Emirates. In 1997, a former university classmate introduced him to Asma, and they married the following year. Asma told me that her husband was "a very kind-hearted person, [but] we didn't have deep conversations about our future or experiences." She added that he liked to sleep a lot, to watch television (usually Al Jazeera and Egyptian movies), and to read "every newspaper he could find." In 2000, the couple had a son, Mohammed. Soon after, al-Haj answered a newspaper advertisement for a trainee position at Al Jazeera, and the family moved to Qatar. He started work on a trial basis in April 2000.

At Al Jazeera al-Haj trained as a cameraman. His colleagues remember him as quiet and eager. As it happened, he didn't have to wait long. After September 11, the network needed journalists willing to work in a war zone, and novices like al-Haj and Abdelhaq Sadah were eager to go. On October 7, al-Haj signed a contract, and three days later the network sent him to Afghanistan with a correspondent named Youssef al-Shouly. "We tried to dissuade him from going because we thought it was too dangerous," his brother, Asim, later told The Associated Press. "But in the end he said this was an opportunity to join the Al Jazeera team and prove himself."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: guantanamo, gitmo, al jazeera, sami al-haj, detainee

Rachel Morris is an editor at The Washington Monthly.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Rights and Liberties! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The New Nazis: Herr Busch and his goose-stepping neocon cabal.
Posted by: HughScott on Jul 23, 2007 9:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A perfect example of George W's blatant disregard for justice and human rights occurred on April 7, 2003, when, under standing White House orders, a B1 bomber carried out a decapitation strike on a Baghdad restaurant where Saddam Hussein was eating a late lunch. Reportedly.

Shortly after the mission began, the Ace of Spades, suspecting he had been betrayed by someone on his staff, slipped out of the al-Sa’ah restaurant’s backdoor and fled the scene. Ten minutes later, four 2,000-pound bunker busters dropped by the diverted bomber blew the suburban eatery to bits along with cooks, waiters, bus boys, customers, cashier, pedestrians passing by and the occupants of three nearby homes.

Fourteen civilians died in that Baghdad neighborhood on April 7, people who lost their lives simply for being there, including two young children. Yet back in the United States, few Americans protested the barbaric aspect of the B1 mission, not on TV or in the press anyway. Quite the contrary, there was glorification of Bush’s decision to “take out Saddam,” as so many in his administration enjoyed saying.
The president claims to be a born-again Christian who got a second chance at life when he turned 40. If that’s the case and not just hypocritical bullshit for public consumption, then he’d better get down on his knees and beg forgiveness from Jesus for killing those poor people on April 7. Because if George W. doesn’t show contrition, which I haven’t seen or heard expressed so far, he may end up in the eternal down-under sharing a table with Saddam in a barbecue joint called “Hell.”

As an addendum to this tawdry tale, in 2004 I watched George W. on CNN answering questions about a retaliatory air assault against Syria by Israeli jets. The reason for the revenge mission was a Hamas suicide bombing of a crowded Jewish eating establishment that killed 20 people.

When asked by a White House reporter if the Israeli raid was justified, Bush glowered and replied sternly, “When Hamas blows up a restaurant with civilians inside, that’s terrorism.”

I kid you not. I heard him say that with my own ears. Those were the exact words spoken by George bin Laden.

To illustrate the extent of Dub-ya’s born-again hypocrisy, read what he said to a group of Iraq women meeting with him in the White House on November 17, 2003:

“We’re seeing the nature of Al Qaeda. They’ll kill innocent people anywhere, any time. That’s just the way they are. They have no regard for human life. They claim they’re religious people, but they’re not. Religious people do not murder innocent citizens. Religious people don’t just indiscriminately bomb.”

Dub-ya’s in-your-face theology is one reason why Muslims hate America so much. His arrogance shows contempt for non-Christian people, one of the great dangers of commingling politics and religion. Bush clearly believes in the name of Jesus Christ he had every right to blow up the al-Sa’ah restaurant and kill (murder) 14 civilians to nail Saddam Hussein.

Conversely, when Muslim insurgents explode a car bomb in Baghdad, he condemns them as Godless thugs. Sociologists call that kind of myopic belief system “ethnocentrism” meaning an emotional attitude that one’s own ethnic group, nation or culture is superior to all others. It is the bedrock of fascism, not freedom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Great post! Posted by: Ydotheyhateus
An American tradition...
Posted by: Blade on Jul 23, 2007 9:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.the7thfire.com

This link provides some history about similiar camps post WWII. I just found it, and haven't checked all credentials, etc. It's on what some might label an anti-Zionist site from a Native American, it seems. Funky site, fairly academic.

Anyway, also, we had the Japanese internment camps, quite different in how they were handled, and background, etc., but similiarities are there.

You could include the way we sequestered Native American "Indians", as internment camps, big time. I think Hitler used that as a pattern for some of his work.

History books should have a chapter titled "Our Secret Traditions", with these secret death camps topping the list.

Funny how brainwashing works. Now for years I still had a fairly positive attitude toward Eisenhower, the first President I was aware of as a kid. Now I see that attitude was just a left over bit of propaganda cluttering my brain that I haven't cleaned up yet...

Sami al-Haj could be representive any of us who oppose this regime. Someday we may know more personally what Sami al-Haj knows. Dahr Jamail's Disneyland America keeps marching on.

Looks like Conyers is getting close to starting impeachment proceedings.

Shortly afterward we'll have another "Terrorist Attack" on the mainland, and Bush/Cheney will declare martial law.

Then more of us will became more empathetic with Sami's situation, as some of us will become intimately acquainted with the same.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why the enmity with Al-Jazeera?
Posted by: sweet_byrd on Jul 23, 2007 3:33 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have always wondered why it is that so many Americans have such dislike for Al-Jazeera. I won't pretend to know the whole story, but I can't help but think that at least some of it is because they present the news with an emphasis on news other than that which occurs in Europe or America.

I think it is a good thing for we as Americans to be reminded that there are people out there who have never heard of Anna Nicole Smith, Paris Hilton or Brittney Spears. We become so wrapped up in our own minutia that it is too easy to forget that there are people and events that matter in places other than North America and Europe. Al-Jazeera reminds us of that fact, and it makes us uncomfortable.

But more than mere discomfort, they Al-Jazeera seems to set off our "If you're not with us, then you're with the terrorists" alarm. Heaven forfend that they be "with" neither party, but just report the news from a point of view heretofore neglected by most media outlets!

And in regards to Guantanamo: I've said it before, and I'll say it again -- The US government needs to s--t or get off the pot. Bring charges and show your evidence, or let these men go. But to hold them without charges, and without letting them see the evidence against them is profoundly un-American. I have never before been glad he is dead, but I am glad that my grandfather died before he could see this -- the man who stood with tears in his eyes during every singing of the National Anthem, and who showed the scars on his leg from the wounds that he got during the attack at Pearl Harbor would be deeply, deeply ashamed of the country that he fought and bled for. And it breaks my heart, but I know that it is so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]